Basement Flat, 6 Park Road, Bognor Regis, West Sussex PO21 2PX
CHI/45UC/LSC/2019/0097 · service charges · Arun · decided 17 Jun 2020
figures not yet checkedThe tribunal dismissed the leaseholders' challenge, finding that the flat must contribute to communal area expenditure such as decorating, cleaning and lighting, and declined to make a section 20C order.
| Outcome | Dismissed or struck out |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Refused |
| Section 20 consultation | Not in issue |
| Who applied | Leaseholder(s) |
| Freeholder / landlord | 6 Park Road Residents Limited |
| Management company | Park Road Residents Limited |
| Managing agent | none named |
| Building | A block, 4 flats |
| Service charge years in dispute | not stated |
| Items in dispute | cleaning and grounds, repairs and maintenance, utilities |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word; the two readings disagreed on something, so these figures haven't been checked yet and are left out of the statistics. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
Their flat is one of 4 flats
- freeholder
Respondent : 6 Park Road Residents Limited
- outcome
As a result of the above finding the application must be dismissed.
- s20c
Considering matters in the round and the outcome that the application has been dismissed the tribunal declines to make any such orders.
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.