Basement 40-42 Sydenham Avenue Liverpool L17 3X
MAN/00BY/LBC/2023/0020 · breach of lease · Liverpool · decided 5 Dec 2024
The Tribunal found it had jurisdiction under section 168(4) because the basement is a dwelling intended to be occupied as separate dwellings, and it dismissed the landlord's claim that the leaseholders had breached the repairing and user covenants.
| Outcome | Other decision |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not applied for |
| Section 20 consultation | Not in issue |
| Who applied | Landlord or management company |
| Freeholder / landlord | Helpfavour Limited |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | none named |
| Building | A block, 2 flats |
| Service charge years in dispute | not stated |
| Items in dispute | repairs and maintenance |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- freeholder
The Applicant, Helpfavour Limited, has been the registered proprietor
- outcome
the application dated 1 September 2023 is dismissed
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.