Barley House 2 Peacock Close, London, NW7 1LD
LON/00AC/LUS/2022/0005 · LUS · Barnet · decided 11 Jul 2023
The tribunal determined under section 94(3) that only £169.28 of accrued uncommitted service charges was held by the landlords at the acquisition date, because under OM Ltd it could not examine challenges to pre-acquisition deductions, and it refused the applicant's request for reimbursement of fees.
| Outcome | Other decision |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not applied for |
| Section 20 consultation | Not in issue |
| Who applied | RTM company |
| Freeholder / landlord | not a company, or not stated |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | HLM Property Management |
| Building | A block, 20 flats |
| Service charge years in dispute | 2021 |
| Items in dispute | cleaning and grounds, insurance, management fees, other, repairs and maintenance, reserve fund |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | £169.28 |
| Fees or costs ordered | the applicant's application for reimbursement of application and hearing fees was refused |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
Barley House is a purpose built block of 20 flats.
- freeholder
The application is against the freeholders of the property, [name] Ground Rent GP Limited and [name] Ground Rent Holdco Limited.
- agent
HLM Property Management (“HLM”) were the property managers before the acquisition date in respect of the property
- outcome
we determine under section 94(3) of the 2002 Act that only the sum of £169.28 is held by the Respondents as accrued non-committed services charges.
- total payable
we determine under section 94(3) of the 2002 Act that only the sum of £169.28 is held by the Respondents as accrued non-committed services charges.
- costs
We refuse the application.
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.