Balmoral House, Canons Way, Bristol, BS1 5LN
CHI/00HB/LBC/2019/0032 · breach of lease · Bristol, City of · decided 17 Feb 2020
The tribunal found the leaseholder in breach of lease clauses 25.2, 26 and 27 by letting flats without consent and without the required covenant and notice, but found the alleged short-term letting and noise breaches not proven and refused the administration charge application for section 146 costs.
| Outcome | Other decision |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not applied for |
| Section 20 consultation | Not in issue |
| Who applied | Landlord or management company |
| Freeholder / landlord | RMB 102 Limited |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | none named |
| Building | A block, 4 flats |
| Service charge years in dispute | 2013, 2017, 2018 |
| Items in dispute | legal and professional fees, administration charges |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- freeholder
joined the new registered freeholder RMB 102 Limited as a party
- outcome
The Respondent is in breach of clauses 25.2, 26 and 27 of Part One of the Eighth Schedule to the Leases.
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.