Babbacome House 2 Babbacombe Road Bromley Kent BR1 3LW
LON/00AF/LDC/2019/0161 · dispensation from consultation · Bromley · decided 23 Oct 2019
The tribunal granted the landlord dispensation from the statutory consultation requirements for urgent roof works to resolve rainwater leaks affecting flats 4 and 8 at Babbacombe House.
| Outcome | Other decision |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not applied for |
| Section 20 consultation | Dispensation granted |
| Who applied | Landlord or management company |
| Freeholder / landlord | Premier Ground Rents No 4 Limited |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | Pinnacle Property Management Ltd |
| Building | A block, 11 flats |
| Service charge years in dispute | not stated |
| Items in dispute | repairs and maintenance |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
comprising of 11 apartments on ground, first and second floors
- freeholder
Applicant : [name] No 4 Limited
- agent
Representative : Pinnacle Property Management Ltd
- outcome
The tribunal grants the applicant dispensation from the statutory consultation requirements of S20 of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985
- s20
The tribunal grants the applicant dispensation from the statutory consultation requirements of S20 of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.