Service Charge Check
part of Rent Rise Check: rent increases, repayment orders and licensing for renters

← Decisions near SS1 2ZS

Audley Court, 1 Forge Way, Southend-on-Sea, SS1 2ZS

CAM/00KF/LAM/2025/0001 · appointment of a manager · Southend-on-Sea · decided 11 Feb 2026

The Tribunal refused to appoint a manager for Audley Court, finding no statutory ground under section 24(2) of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1987 was made out and that an appointment would not be just and convenient.

OutcomeNot payable
Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case)Not applied for
Section 20 consultationNot in issue
Who appliedLeaseholder(s)
Freeholder / landlordGateway Holdings (NWB) Ltd
Management companynone named
Managing agentGateway Property Management Ltd
BuildingAn estate, 66 flats
Service charge years in disputenot stated
Items in disputeinsurance, management fees, major works, repairs and maintenance, cleaning and grounds, reserve fund, utilities
Items disallowed or reducedinsurance, management fees, repairs and maintenance, utilities
Total demandednot stated as one figure
Total found payablenot stated as one figure
Fees or costs orderednone stated

Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.

What the decision says

flats n
consisting of 66 apartments with private gated gardens and car parking area
freeholder
Respondent : Gateway Holdings (NWB) Ltd
agent
The Respondent instructed Gateway Property Management Ltd (“GPM”) as its managing agent.
outcome
The Tribunal does not make an order for appointment of the proposed manager.

The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].

The original

If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).

Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.

Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.