Atlantic House, 46 West Bar Street, Banbury, OX16 9RZ
CAM/38UB/LDC/2024/0610 · dispensation from consultation · Cherwell · decided 6 May 2025
The tribunal granted retrospective dispensation from the section 20 consultation requirements for urgent repairs to Flat 3 carried out by RPS Contracts Midlands Ltd, so the landlord does not have to reconsult on that work.
| Outcome | Other decision |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not applied for |
| Section 20 consultation | Dispensation granted |
| Who applied | Landlord or management company |
| Freeholder / landlord | Danesdale Land Limited |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | none named |
| Building | A block, 20 flats |
| Service charge years in dispute | not stated |
| Items in dispute | repairs and maintenance |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | £38,956.98 |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
In or around 2018 the Property was converted into 20 apartment dwellings
- freeholder
Applicant : Danesdale Land Limited
- outcome
The Tribunal is satisfied that it is reasonable to dispense with compliance with
- total demanded
the cost of the works carried out by RPS Contracts Midlands Ltd for which dispensation is sought is £38,956.98 including VAT
- s20
The Tribunal is satisfied that it is reasonable to dispense with compliance with
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.