Service Charge Check
part of Rent Rise Check: rent increases, repayment orders and licensing for renters

← Decisions near KT18 5AZ

Ashley House, Ashley Road, Epsom, KT18 5AZ

CHI/43UC/LIS/2022/0013 · LIS · Epsom and Ewell · decided 29 Nov 2022

The Tribunal set the amounts payable on account for Flats 1, 10 and 11 for 2019 to 2022, reducing the demands by removing duplicated management fees and unexplained VAT, and declined to order reimbursement of the application fees.

OutcomeReduced
Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case)Not applied for
Section 20 consultationNot in issue
Who appliedLandlord or management company
Freeholder / landlordAshley HS Sub Limited
Management companynone named
Managing agentPeak Estates Limited
BuildingA block, 12 flats
Service charge years in dispute2019, 2021, 2022
Items in disputecleaning and grounds, insurance, management fees, repairs and maintenance, utilities
Items disallowed or reducedmanagement fees, other
Total demanded£21.38
Total found payablenot stated as one figure
Fees or costs orderednone stated

Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.

What the decision says

flats n
describe the Building as a “block” of 12 flats
freeholder
Applicant : Ashley HS Sub Limited
agent
Peak Estates Limited as the Landlord’s managing agent
years
for the years 1st January 2019 to 31st December 2021 and December 2022
outcome
The amounts payable for the interim demands for the following
items reduced
The additional management fee and VAT thereon has been charged twice in

The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].

The original

If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).

Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.

Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.