Arlington House, All Saints Avenue, Margate, CT9 1XS

CHI/29UN/LDC/2019/0097 · dispensation from consultation · Thanet · decided 12 May 2020

figures not yet checked

The tribunal granted the landlord dispensation from the section 20 consultation requirement for replacing the lifts at Arlington House, subject to conditions including an independent lift engineer's report and a shortened observation period for leaseholders.

Outcome	Other decision
Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case)	Not applied for
Section 20 consultation	Dispensation granted
Who applied	Landlord or management company
Freeholder / landlord	Metropolitan Property Realizations Ltd
Management company	none named
Managing agent	none named
Building	A block, 143 flats
Service charge years in dispute	not stated
Items in dispute	legal and professional fees
Items disallowed or reduced	none stated
Total demanded	not stated as one figure
Total found payable	not stated as one figure
Fees or costs ordered	none stated

Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word; the two readings disagreed on something, so these figures haven't been checked yet and are left out of the statistics. Compare with the original.

What the decision says

flats n: The Property is a large 1960’s tower block consisting of 143 flats over 18 storeys.
freeholder: Applicant : Metropolitan Property Realizations Ltd
outcome: we determine that we should grant dispensation but subject to conditions which we set out below
s20: we determine that we should grant dispensation but subject to conditions which we set out below

The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].

The original

If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).

Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.

Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.