Arcade Park, Tynemouth, NE30 4HP
MAN/00CK/LDC/2024/0070 · dispensation from consultation · North Tyneside · decided 2 May 2025
The tribunal granted the landlord dispensation from the s.20 consultation requirements for the window replacement works at Arcade Park, so the cost is not limited to £250 per leaseholder, without deciding whether the costs are reasonable or payable.
| Outcome | Other decision |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not applied for |
| Section 20 consultation | Consultation failure found |
| Who applied | Landlord or management company |
| Freeholder / landlord | The Arcade Apartments Management Company Limited |
| Management company | The Arcade Apartments Management Company Limited |
| Managing agent | none named |
| Building | A block, 12 flats |
| Service charge years in dispute | not stated |
| Items in dispute | major works |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
split into 12 residential flats
- freeholder
The applicant is the Arcade Apartments Management Company Limited, a Resident Management Company.
- outcome
The application for dispensation pursuant to s.20ZA Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 is granted in respect of the window replacement works
- s20
Whilst the applicant was required by section 20 of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 to undertake the consultation procedure set out in Part 2 of Schedule 4
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.