Appleton Point, Ham Strasse, Bradford BD1 4NN
MAN/00CX/LDC/2024/0626 · dispensation from consultation · Bradford · decided 27 Jun 2025
The tribunal granted the landlord RMB 102 Limited permission to dispense with the section 20 consultation requirements for urgent roof membrane and parapet cladding capping works at Appleton Point, subject to conditions including providing reports and quotations, using negotiated tender, and starting the works by 1 October 2025.
| Outcome | Other decision |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not applied for |
| Section 20 consultation | Dispensation granted |
| Who applied | Landlord or management company |
| Freeholder / landlord | RMB 102 Limited |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | none named |
| Building | A block, 160 flats |
| Service charge years in dispute | not stated |
| Items in dispute | major works |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
The Property consists of 160 individual apartments located over three floors.
- freeholder
The Application dated 19 December 2024 is made on behalf of RMB 102 Limited
- outcome
The Application is granted.
- s20
The Applicant is permitted to dispense with the requirements of section 20 Landlord and
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.