Appleton Point, 1 Hamm Strasse, Bradford BD1 4NN
MAN/00CX/LDC/2022/0059 · dispensation from consultation · Bradford · decided 1 Aug 2023
The tribunal granted the landlord unconditional dispensation from the statutory consultation requirements for urgent spandrel panel works at Appleton Point, and leaseholders can still challenge the reasonableness of the costs later.
| Outcome | Other decision |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not applied for |
| Section 20 consultation | Dispensation granted |
| Who applied | Landlord or management company |
| Freeholder / landlord | RMB 102 Limited |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | Premier Estates Limited |
| Building | A block, 160 flats |
| Service charge years in dispute | not stated |
| Items in dispute | repairs and maintenance |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
consisting of 160 individual apartments
- freeholder
confirmed that the Applicant is the Landlord and Freeholder of the Premises
- agent
Premier Estates Limited were appointed as managing agent to the Applicant on the 1 September 2021
- outcome
The application for dispensation from consultation under s20ZA Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 is granted
- s20
The application for dispensation from consultation under s20ZA Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 is granted
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.