Apartments 8 and 10 Westhorpe House, Westhorpe Park, Marlow SL7 3FJ
CAM/00MX/LSC/2025/0657 · service charges · Buckinghamshire · decided 2 Feb 2026
The tribunal set budgets for the 2023, 2024 and 2025 service charge years for the two apartments, found management fees reasonable, and made an order that the landlord cannot recover the costs of these proceedings through the service charge.
| Outcome | Other decision |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Order made |
| Section 20 consultation | Consultation failure found |
| Who applied | Leaseholder(s) |
| Freeholder / landlord | Windmill Hampton Hill Limited |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | Cleaver Management Company Limited |
| Building | One flat, 33 flats |
| Service charge years in dispute | 2023, 2024, 2025 |
| Items in dispute | administration charges, insurance, management fees, utilities |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
within an estate of 33 apartments
- freeholder
Respondent : Windmill Hampton Hill Limited
- agent
Westhorpe Estate Management Company Limited had managed the Property since August 2024, after which time Cleaver Management Company Limited had taken over.
- years
The application relates to the service charge years 2023, 2024 and 2025.
- outcome
The Tribunal determines that, for the purposes of section 27A of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985, the service charges payable for the Property in respect of the 2023, 2024 and 2025 service charge years are as set out in this decision and its Annex.
- s20c
The application for an order under section 20C of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 is granted.
- s20
If there had been such an obligation, then there was no consultation and no dispensation given for a failure to consult so the charge to leaseholders would have been limited to £250 per apartment.
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.