Apartments 1-8 Cudham Hall, Cudham Lane, South Cudham, Sevenoaks, Kent, TN14 7QB
LON/00AF/LDC/2021/0301 · dispensation from consultation · Bromley · decided 30 Mar 2022
The tribunal granted the landlord unconditional dispensation from the statutory consultation requirements for window repairs to Apartments 5 and 6, but this does not decide whether the cost of the works is reasonable.
| Outcome | Other decision |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not applied for |
| Section 20 consultation | Dispensation granted |
| Who applied | Landlord or management company |
| Freeholder / landlord | Purelake Investments Limited |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | none named |
| Building | A block, 8 flats |
| Service charge years in dispute | not stated |
| Items in dispute | repairs and maintenance |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
The Property is a listed converted residential block comprising 8 apartments.
- freeholder
Applicant : Purelake Investments Limited
- outcome
The tribunal dispenses unconditionally with the consultation requirements in respect of the qualifying works which are the subject of this application.
- s20
The tribunal dispenses unconditionally with the consultation requirements in respect of the qualifying works which are the subject of this application.
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.