Apartment 62 Waterside Apartments, 10 William Jessop Way, Liverpool, L3 1DX
MAN/00BY/LSC/2024/0253 · service charges · Liverpool · decided 2 Oct 2025
The Tribunal found the buildings insurance service charges for December 2021 to November 2024 reasonable and payable, and declined to make a paragraph 5A order restricting the landlord's costs of the proceedings as administration charges.
| Outcome | Payable as demanded |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not clear |
| Section 20 consultation | Not in issue |
| Who applied | Leaseholder(s) |
| Freeholder / landlord | Half Tide Dock Limited |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | Boothman Property Associates Limited |
| Building | One flat |
| Service charge years in dispute | 2021, 2022 |
| Items in dispute | insurance |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- freeholder
[name] Dock Limited, the residents’ property management company of the Property.
- agent
The Respondent has appointed a managing agent, Boothman Property Associates Limited, to manage the Block.
- years
buildings insurance for the period December 2021 to November 2022
- outcome
the service charges raised in respect of the buildings insurance for the Property for the period December 2021 to November 2024 are payable and reasonable.
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.