Apartment 46, 111 The Ropewalk, Nottingham, NG1 5DJ

BIR/37UH/LLC/2025/0006 · LLC · Nottingham · decided 16 Jun 2026

figures not yet checked

The tribunal determined that two service charge invoices totalling £2,510.96 are not payable because the respondents did not oppose the application, made a section 20C costs protection order and a paragraph 5A order, and ordered reimbursement of the £114 application fee.

Outcome	Not payable
Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case)	Order made
Section 20 consultation	Not in issue
Who applied	Leaseholder(s)
Freeholder / landlord	not a company, or not stated
Management company	none named
Managing agent	none named
Building	One flat
Service charge years in dispute	2022, 2023
Items in dispute	administration charges
Items disallowed or reduced	none stated
Total demanded	£2,510.96
Total found payable	not stated as one figure
Fees or costs ordered	the respondent to reimburse the applicant's application fee of £114.00

Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word; the two readings disagreed on something, so these figures haven't been checked yet and are left out of the statistics. Compare with the original.

What the decision says

years: for the half years 1 October 2022 – 31 March 2023
outcome: I determine that the Invoices are not payable.
total demanded: two service charge invoices totalling £2,510.96 are not payable
s20c: I order that pursuant to section 20C of the Act
costs: the Respondents must reimburse the Applicant the fee of £114.00 paid for the making of this application

The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].

The original

If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).

Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.

Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.