Apartment 409 The Franklin Bournville, Bournville Birmingham B30 2HP
BIR/00CN/LSC/2025/0043 · service charges · Birmingham · decided 29 Jul 2026
The tribunal dismissed the leaseholder's claim that service charges and insurance rent should be apportioned by apartment size, finding the landlord's equal apportionment was permitted by the lease, and made no s20C order.
| Outcome | Dismissed or struck out |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Refused |
| Section 20 consultation | Not in issue |
| Who applied | Leaseholder(s) |
| Freeholder / landlord | The Franklin House (Bournville) Management Company Ltd |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | The Franklin House (Bournville) Management Company Ltd |
| Building | One flat, 79 flats |
| Service charge years in dispute | 2017, 2025 |
| Items in dispute | insurance, other |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
between the 79 flats in the block
- freeholder
Respondent 1 : The Franklin House (Bournville)
- years
for the period 2017 - 2025
- outcome
The Applicant’s claim is dismissed.
- s20c
The Tribunal makes no order on the application for a determination under s20C
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.