Apartment 29, Forth Banks Tower, Forth Banks, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE1 3PN
MAN/00CJ/LSC/2019/0063 · service charges · Newcastle upon Tyne · decided 30 Sep 2020
The tribunal found the major works charges reasonable apart from the managing agent's fee, which it capped at £11,810.81 net of VAT, and made an order under section 20C so the landlord's costs of the case cannot be added to the service charge.
| Outcome | Reduced |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Order made |
| Section 20 consultation | Not in issue |
| Who applied | Leaseholder(s) |
| Freeholder / landlord | Triplerose Limited |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | none named |
| Building | One flat, 38 flats |
| Service charge years in dispute | 2019 |
| Items in dispute | major works, management fees, reserve fund |
| Items disallowed or reduced | management fees |
| Total demanded | £128,693.50 |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | no order for costs |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
There are 38 flats in the building
- freeholder
Respondent : Triplerose Limited
- years
service charges in respect of the Property for the service charge year 2019
- outcome
the reasonable sum for the managing agent’s fee relating to the major works is capped at £11,810.81 (net of VAT)
- items reduced
the reasonable sum for the managing agent’s fee relating to the major works is capped at £11,810.81 (net of VAT)
- s20c
Order made under Section 20(C) of the Act.
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.