Apartment 22, Merchant Exchange, Skeldergate, York, YO1 6DG
MAN/00FF/LSC/2019/0027 · service charges · York · decided 24 Jan 2020
figures not yet checkedThe tribunal dismissed the leaseholder's s.20B challenge as an abuse of process and found the 2011 to 2014 service charges payable for Apartments 15 and 22 as shown in the unaudited accounts, with no s.20C order made.
| Outcome | Payable as demanded |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Refused |
| Section 20 consultation | Not in issue |
| Who applied | Leaseholder(s) |
| Freeholder / landlord | not a company, or not stated |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | J H Watson Property Management Limited |
| Building | One flat · 2 decisions about this building |
| Service charge years in dispute | 2011 |
| Items in dispute | administration charges, legal and professional fees |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word; the two readings disagreed on something, so these figures haven't been checked yet and are left out of the statistics. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- agent
J H Watson Property Management Limited (“Watsons”)
- years
for the year ended 31 December 2011 £1675.52
- outcome
after deduction of payments made by the Applicant and retained by the Respondent
- s20c
In view of the Tribunal’s conclusions, no order is made under s.20C of the Act.
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.