Apartment 177, Westgate, Apartments, 14 Western Gateway, London, E16 1BN
LON/00BB/LBC/2020/0058 · breach of lease · Newham · decided 18 Feb 2021
figures not yet checkedThe tribunal decided that the respondent leaseholder had not breached her lease covenants over a dog and foul water discharge caused by her subtenant's guests, because she had taken active steps to prevent and then stop the breach.
| Outcome | Dismissed or struck out |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not applied for |
| Section 20 consultation | Not in issue |
| Who applied | Landlord or management company |
| Freeholder / landlord | not a company, or not stated |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | none named |
| Building | One flat, 224 flats |
| Service charge years in dispute | 2020 |
| Items in dispute | cleaning and grounds, utilities |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word; the two readings disagreed on something, so these figures haven't been checked yet and are left out of the statistics. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
There are around 224 flats in the Building
- outcome
the tribunal declines to make the determination sought pursuant to section 168(4) of the 2002 Act that there has been a breach of the Lease by the Respondent in this case.
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.