Apartment 147, 1 Prescot Street, London E1 8RL
LON/00BG/LSC/2019/0071 · service charges · Tower Hamlets · decided 12 Aug 2019
The Tribunal found the estimated service charges of £8,118.91 for each of 2018 and 2019, plus £786.98 interest, payable, refused a section 20C order, and later ordered the respondent to pay £18,500 of the applicant's costs for unreasonable conduct.
| Outcome | Payable as demanded |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Refused |
| Section 20 consultation | Not in issue |
| Who applied | Landlord or management company |
| Freeholder / landlord | not a company, or not stated |
| Management company | Prescot Management Co Ltd |
| Managing agent | Islington Properties |
| Building | One flat, 150 flats |
| Service charge years in dispute | 2018, 2019 |
| Items in dispute | administration charges, other |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | respondent to pay the applicant's costs of £18,500 under rule 13(1)(b) |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
one of 150 flats in a converted office block
- management company
Applicant : Prescot Management Co Ltd
- agent
Mr [name] of the managing agents, Islington Properties
- years
£8,118.91 in each of 2018 and 2019
- outcome
are payable by the Respondent
- s20c
There shall be no order under section 20C of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985.
- costs
in the sum of £18,500 under rule 13(1)(b)
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.