Apartment 106 & 205, 7 Ownall Road, Birmingham, B34 7AH
BIR/00CN/LIS/2020/0035 · LIS · Birmingham · decided 6 Mar 2023
figures not yet checkedThe tribunal found the estate charges from LCP Securities were not payable, reduced the Block A service charges for each year, and ordered that Clarion repay the applicants' tribunal fees and that its costs cannot be added to the service charge.
| Outcome | Not payable |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Order made |
| Section 20 consultation | Not in issue |
| Who applied | Leaseholder(s) |
| Freeholder / landlord | LCP Securities Ltd |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | KWB Property Management |
| Building | A block, 26 flats |
| Service charge years in dispute | 2015, 2016, 2017, 2018, 2019, 2020 |
| Items in dispute | administration charges, cleaning and grounds, insurance, legal and professional fees, major works, management fees, other, repairs and maintenance, reserve fund, utilities |
| Items disallowed or reduced | cleaning and grounds, management fees, other, repairs and maintenance, reserve fund, utilities |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | the respondent to repay all application and hearing fees paid by the applicants |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word; the two readings disagreed on something, so these figures haven't been checked yet and are left out of the statistics. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
allocating expenditure equally between all 26 units
- agent
Ms [name] – as Associate Director of KWB Property Management, Clarion’s managing agent for Development
- years
being 2015/16, 2016/17, 2017/18, 2018/19, 2019/20, and 2020/21
- outcome
We determine that the Estate Charges for all the years in dispute are not payable.
- items reduced
Cleaning 1,799.00 643.34 We agree that the time spent on cleaning was excessive
- s20c
We order that pursuant to section 20C of the Act, none of the First Respondent’s costs of this application are to be regarded as relevant costs
- costs
We order Clarion to repay all fees paid to HMCTS by the Applicants in relation to this case to the Applicants who paid them.
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.