Apartment 1-16 Purcell’s Court, George Lane, Marlborough, Wiltshire SN8 4BS
CHI/00HY/LDC/2023/0130 · dispensation from consultation · Wiltshire · decided 19 Dec 2023
The tribunal granted dispensation from the statutory consultation requirements for the car park extension creating 3 additional parking spaces, on condition that the costs of the application are not recovered through the service charge.
| Outcome | Other decision |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not applied for |
| Section 20 consultation | Dispensation granted |
| Who applied | Landlord or management company |
| Freeholder / landlord | not a company, or not stated |
| Management company | Purcell’s Court Management Company Limited |
| Managing agent | Warwick Estates Management Limited |
| Building | A block |
| Service charge years in dispute | not stated |
| Items in dispute | major works |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none of the costs of making the S.20ZA application to be recovered from the lessees by way of service charge |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- management company
Applicant : Purcell’s Court Management Company Limited
- agent
Representative : Warwick Estates Management Limited
- outcome
The Tribunal therefore grants dispensation from the consultation requirements of S.20 Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 in respect of the extension to the car park to create 3 additional parking spaces.
- s20
The Tribunal therefore grants dispensation from the consultation requirements of S.20 Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 in respect of the extension to the car park to create 3 additional parking spaces.
- costs
none of the costs of making the S.20ZA application shall be recovered from the Lessees by way of service charge
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.