Service Charge Check
part of Rent Rise Check: rent increases, repayment orders and licensing for renters

← Decisions near EN2 8LA

Antlia Court, 57 Hadley Road, Enfield London, EN2 8LA

LON/00AK/LCP/2024/0603 · LCP · Enfield · decided 24 Feb 2025

The tribunal decided that the RTM company's former members must pay the landlord £1,700 plus VAT, disbursements and VAT on them, as its costs after the claim notice was withdrawn, within 28 days.

OutcomeOther decision
Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case)Not applied for
Section 20 consultationNot in issue
Who appliedLandlord or management company
Freeholder / landlordKnightspur Homes Ltd
Management companynone named
Managing agentnone named
BuildingA block
Service charge years in disputenot stated
Items in disputenot stated
Items disallowed or reducednone stated
Total demanded£2,887.20
Total found payablenot stated as one figure
Fees or costs orderedthe respondents to pay the applicant £1,700 plus VAT of £340, disbursements of £81 and VAT of £16.20

Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.

What the decision says

freeholder
Applicant : Knightspur Homes Ltd
outcome
The tribunal determines that the amount payable by the Respondents to the Applicant in respect of the Landlord’s costs payable by the RTM company
total demanded
a schedule of costs totalling £2887.20
costs
the amount payable by the Respondents to the Applicant in respect of the Landlord’s costs payable by the RTM company will be the sum of £1,700 plus VAT of £340

The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].

The original

If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).

Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.

Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.