Antiopa House, 1 Coal Lane SW9 Yorks House, 5 Coal Lane SW9 Leno House, 11 Coal Lane SW9 The Offices, Brixton Edge, 86-88 Gresham Road/Valentia Place SW9
LON/00AY/LVT/2024/0002 · LVT · Lambeth · decided 23 Apr 2024
The Tribunal refused the leaseholders' application to replace the management company Gateway Property Management Ltd with another company by varying the leases, but made a section 20C order limiting the landlord's litigation costs that can be charged to the service charge.
| Outcome | Dismissed or struck out |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Order made |
| Section 20 consultation | Not in issue |
| Who applied | Leaseholder(s) |
| Freeholder / landlord | Calibri GR Limited |
| Management company | Gateway Property Management Ltd |
| Managing agent | Gateway Property Management Ltd |
| Building | A block, 71 flats |
| Service charge years in dispute | 2017 |
| Items in dispute | not stated |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
containing a total of 71 residential flats
- freeholder
The current freeholder is Calibri GR Limited.
- agent
Respondent : Gateway Property Management Ltd
- outcome
The Tribunal declines to grant the application for the variation of leases
- s20c
The Tribunal makes an order under section 20C of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.