Amended Decision 364 Southwyck House Estate, Clarewood Walk, London, SW9 8TT & 203 Southwyck House Estate Clarewood Walk, London, SW9 8TT

LON/00AY/LSC/2025/0889 · service charges · Lambeth · decided 20 Jan 2026

figures not yet checked

The tribunal struck out the leaseholders' challenge to the £17,042.79 boiler replacement charge because they had agreed to pay it under prompt payment discount agreements, so the tribunal had no jurisdiction.

Outcome	Dismissed or struck out
Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case)	Refused
Section 20 consultation	Not in issue
Who applied	Leaseholder(s)
Freeholder / landlord	not a company, or not stated
Management company	none named
Managing agent	none named
Building	One flat, 173 flats
Service charge years in dispute	2021
Items in dispute	major works
Items disallowed or reduced	none stated
Total demanded	£17,042.79
Total found payable	not stated as one figure
Fees or costs ordered	none stated

Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word; the two readings disagreed on something, so these figures haven't been checked yet and are left out of the statistics. Compare with the original.

What the decision says

flats n: comprises six blocks including 173 residential flats
years: in respect of the service charge year 2021/22
outcome: The application is struck out under Rule 9(2)(a) of the Tribunal Procedure
total demanded: a service charge demand of £17,042.79 for the replacement of the communal boiler system
s20c: we are satisfied that we should make no order under section 20c against the Respondent

The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].

The original

This decision replaces an earlier one for the same case: 22 Dec 2025.

If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).

Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.

Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.