Allingham Court, King Coel Road, Colchester, Essex, CO3 9AQ
CAM/22UG/LDC/2019/0041 · dispensation from consultation · Colchester · decided 4 Feb 2020
The tribunal granted the landlord partial dispensation from the section 20 consultation requirements for replacing the boundary wall with a fence, on condition that leaseholders are sent a letter about the selected quotation and their estimated contributions.
| Outcome | Other decision |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not applied for |
| Section 20 consultation | Dispensation granted |
| Who applied | Landlord or management company |
| Freeholder / landlord | Kirsch Securities Limited |
| Management company | City Management Limited |
| Managing agent | Town & City Management Limited |
| Building | A block, 4 flats |
| Service charge years in dispute | not stated |
| Items in dispute | repairs and maintenance |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
The Property was described in the Application as being a purpose-built block of 4 flats.
- freeholder
Applicant : Kirsch Securities Limited
- agent
Managing Agent : Town & City Management Limited
- outcome
The Tribunal determines that it is reasonable to dispense with a Notice of the Landlord’s Proposals.
- s20
The Tribunal determines that it is reasonable to dispense with a Notice of the Landlord’s Proposals
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.