Alder Grove / Maple Leaf Close, Ingol, Preston PR2 7DW
MAN/30UK/LDC/2025/0680 · dispensation from consultation · Preston · decided 12 Apr 2026
The tribunal granted the landlord retrospective dispensation from the section 20 consultation requirements for fire safety remedial works at Alder Grove completed in April 2024, finding no evidence of prejudice to leaseholders, while noting the tribunal cannot decide builder liability in this application.
| Outcome | Other decision |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not applied for |
| Section 20 consultation | Dispensation granted |
| Who applied | Landlord or management company |
| Freeholder / landlord | Village Green 1 (Preston) Management Co Ltd |
| Management company | Village Green 1 (Preston) Management Co Ltd |
| Managing agent | Residential Management Group Ltd |
| Building | An estate, 16 flats |
| Service charge years in dispute | not stated |
| Items in dispute | other |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
consists of 16 residential units arranged across 3 buildings
- freeholder
Applicant : [name] Green 1 ([name])
- agent
Representative : Residential Management Group Ltd
- outcome
The Tribunal grants dispensation from the consultation requirements of
- s20
The Tribunal grants dispensation from the consultation requirements of
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.