Albion Place, Campbell Park, Milton Keynes, MK9 4AB
CAM/00MG/LDC/2023/0050 · dispensation from consultation · Milton Keynes · decided 28 Nov 2023
The tribunal granted dispensation from the statutory consultation requirements for additional urgent roof and roof edge repairs at the block, and the RTM company must bear its own application costs, which cannot be recovered from leaseholders.
| Outcome | Other decision |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not applied for |
| Section 20 consultation | Dispensation granted |
| Who applied | RTM company |
| Freeholder / landlord | not a company, or not stated |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | Warwick House Estates |
| Building | A block, 15 flats |
| Service charge years in dispute | not stated |
| Items in dispute | repairs and maintenance |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | applicant to bear its own costs of the application, not recoverable as service charge |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
a purpose built block of 15 flats
- agent
Warwick House Estates
- outcome
The Tribunal grants dispensation from the requirements on the applicant
- s20
The Tribunal grants dispensation from the requirements on the applicant
- costs
The applicant will meet all of its costs arising from the making and determination of this application.
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.