Service Charge Check
part of Rent Rise Check: rent increases, repayment orders and licensing for renters

← Decisions near ME4 4ST

Admiralty Gate, Dock Road, Chatham, Kent, ME4 4ST

CHI/00LC/LSC/2022/0004 · service charges · Medway · decided 24 Oct 2022

figures not yet checked

The tribunal found the 2022 service charge budget of £65,386.00 properly stated, found the 2018 consultation compliant and consultancy costs not subject to consultation, required demands to follow the lease payment dates, and refused a section 20C order.

OutcomePayable as demanded
Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case)Refused
Section 20 consultationNot in issue
Who appliedLeaseholder(s)
Freeholder / landlordnot a company, or not stated
Management companynone named
Managing agentnone named
BuildingA block
Service charge years in dispute2022
Items in disputemajor works, reserve fund
Items disallowed or reducednone stated
Total demanded£65,386
Total found payable£65,386
Fees or costs orderednone stated

Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word; the two readings disagreed on something, so these figures haven't been checked yet and are left out of the statistics. Compare with the original.

What the decision says

freeholder
Respondent : Admiralty Gate Limited
years
the Annual Service Charge Budget for 2022 is properly stated
outcome
the Annual Service Charge Budget for 2022 is properly stated at a Grand Total of £65,386.00
total demanded
properly stated at a Grand Total of £65,386.00
total payable
properly stated at a Grand Total of £65,386.00
s20c
The Tribunal declines to make Orders either under Section 20C of

The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].

The original

If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).

Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.

Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.