Admirals Walk, West Cliff Road, Bournemouth, Dorset, BH2 5HG
CHI/00HN/LDC/2023/0018 · dispensation from consultation · Bournemouth, Christchurch and Poole · decided 12 Apr 2023
The Tribunal granted the landlord unconditional dispensation from the statutory consultation requirements for urgent concrete repairs and scaffolding raising at the block, and made no order on the leaseholders' request for the landlord to fund a second surveyor's opinion.
| Outcome | Other decision |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not applied for |
| Section 20 consultation | Dispensation granted |
| Who applied | Landlord or management company |
| Freeholder / landlord | Admirals Walk 2000 Ltd |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | Napier Management Services Ltd |
| Building | A block, 121 flats |
| Service charge years in dispute | 2021 |
| Items in dispute | repairs and maintenance |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
comprising some 121 self-contained flats of varying size
- freeholder
Applicant : [name] Walk 2000 Ltd
- agent
Representative : Napier Management Services Ltd
- outcome
the Tribunal grants unconditional dispensation from the consultation requirements of Section 20 of the Act
- s20
the Tribunal grants unconditional dispensation from the consultation requirements of Section 20 of the Act
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.