Abell House, 31 John Islip Road, London SW1P 4FE
LON/00BK/LDC/2025/0710 · dispensation from consultation · Westminster · decided 16 Jul 2025
The tribunal granted the landlord dispensation from the statutory consultation requirements for urgent car lift repair works at Abell House, without conditions, while making no finding on whether the costs are reasonable or payable.
| Outcome | Other decision |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not applied for |
| Section 20 consultation | Dispensation granted |
| Who applied | Landlord or management company |
| Freeholder / landlord | Harland (PC) Limited |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | none named |
| Building | A block, 144 flats |
| Service charge years in dispute | 2024 |
| Items in dispute | repairs and maintenance |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
Abell House is a 15-storey building containing 144 apartments
- freeholder
Applicant : [name] (PC) Limited
- years
in respect of works undertaken at the Property which commenced in December 2024
- outcome
The Applicant is granted dispensation under Section 20ZA of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985
- s20
The Tribunal therefore grants dispensation from the consultation requirements of S.20 Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 in respect of works of car lift repair within the Property
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.