Service Charge Check
part of Rent Rise Check: rent increases, repayment orders and licensing for renters

← Decisions near PE19 6XF

Abbotsley Country Homes, Drewels Lane, St Neots, Cambridgeshire, PE19 6XF

CAM/12UE/LSC/2024/0030 · service charges · Huntingdonshire · decided 25 Jul 2025

figures not yet checked

The tribunal decided that the Respondent's High Court legal costs are not payable through the service charge or as administration charges, and made a section 20C order.

OutcomeNot payable
Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case)Order made
Section 20 consultationNot in issue
Who appliedLeaseholder(s)
Freeholder / landlordnot a company, or not stated
Management companynone named
Managing agentnone named
BuildingA block, 20 flats
Service charge years in dispute2023
Items in disputeadministration charges, legal and professional fees
Items disallowed or reducedadministration charges, legal and professional fees
Total demandednot stated as one figure
Total found payablenot stated as one figure
Fees or costs orderednone stated

Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word; the two readings disagreed on something, so these figures haven't been checked yet and are left out of the statistics. Compare with the original.

What the decision says

flats n
It accommodates 20 holiday chalets
freeholder
The freehold titles to the Chalet Land and surrounding land are owned by Abbotsley Limited (“Abbotsley”)
years
For 2023, the Applicants disputed the £110,809 for legal and professional fees shown in the accounts.
outcome
(1) The sums sought from each Applicant for the legal costs of the High Court litigation, as described below, are not payable as service charges under the terms of their underlease.
items reduced
(2) The charges sought from each Applicant by the Respondent’s managing agents in respect of non-payment of those service charges are not payable as administration charges under the terms of their underlease.
s20c
it appears just and equitable to make an order under section 20C in respect of all costs incurred, to avoid any possible dispute about this in future.

The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].

The original

If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).

Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.

Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.