9A Thornhill Road, Huddersfield, HD3 3DD
MAN/00CZ/LSC/2022/0053 · service charges · Kirklees · decided 3 Jan 2024
The tribunal found that the leaseholder is not liable to pay for the replacement windows to the upper flat, that no roof repair sum is currently payable because no statement of rights and obligations was served, and that no insurance contribution is payable under the non-compliant policy, while the costs application was dismissed and the county court ordered only ground rent of £6.50 to be paid.
| Outcome | Not payable |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not clear |
| Section 20 consultation | Not in issue |
| Who applied | Leaseholder(s) |
| Freeholder / landlord | not a company, or not stated |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | none named |
| Building | One flat, 2 flats |
| Service charge years in dispute | 2019, 2020, 2021 |
| Items in dispute | insurance, other, repairs and maintenance |
| Items disallowed or reduced | insurance, other, repairs and maintenance |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | £6.50 |
| Fees or costs ordered | no order for costs |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- years
for the years 2019-2021 inclusive (claim 0074)
- outcome
There is no sum payable by Ms [name] to Mr [name] in respect of the replacement windows to the Upper flat (claim 0053).
- items reduced
There is no sum currently payable by Ms [name] to Mr [name] in respect of Roof Repairs for 2021(claim 0074).
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.