9A Belsize Crescent, London NW3 5QY
LON/00AG/LSC/2023/0432 · service charges · Camden · decided 5 Dec 2024
The tribunal refused the leaseholders' section 20C application and ordered them to pay the landlord £70,000.00 towards its costs because they had acted unreasonably in bringing and conducting the proceedings.
| Outcome | Other decision |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Refused |
| Section 20 consultation | Not in issue |
| Who applied | Leaseholder(s) |
| Freeholder / landlord | not a company, or not stated |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | none named |
| Building | One flat |
| Service charge years in dispute | not stated |
| Items in dispute | major works, repairs and maintenance, legal and professional fees |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | the respondent to the substantive application to pay the applicant £70,000.00 in respect of costs under rule 13(1)(b) |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- outcome
Pursuant to rule 13(1)(b) of The Tribunal Procedure (First-tier Tribunal) (Property Chamber) Rules 2013, we order that the
- s20c
We refuse the application.
- costs
£70,000.00 in respect of costs.
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.