96 Rothesay Gardens Plymouth PL5 3TA 146 Rothesay Gardens Plymouth PL5 3TA
CHI/00HG/LSC/2022/0071 · service charges · Plymouth · decided 12 Apr 2023
No plain-English summary for this decision yet. See the original.
| Outcome | Payable as demanded |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not applied for |
| Section 20 consultation | Not in issue |
| Who applied | Landlord or management company |
| Freeholder / landlord | Plymouth Community Homes Limited |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | none named |
| Building | One flat, 6 flats |
| Service charge years in dispute | not stated |
| Items in dispute | administration charges, major works, repairs and maintenance |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | £16,396.67 |
| Fees or costs ordered | the respondent to reimburse court fees £1,025 |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
The property at 34 Herbert Street [name] is a first floor flat in a block of six flats.
- freeholder
The Applicant is the freeholder of the three properties which are the subject of this Application.
- outcome
The Respondent is liable to pay the sum of £7,965.60 and demanded on 15 October 2019 in respect of the works at 96 [name] Gardens
- total payable
The Defendant to pay the Claimant the sum of £16,396.67 due in service charges.
- costs
Court fees of £455 for each of the Claim Number H6QZ4Y3M, H6QZ3Y5M and £115 for Claim Number H6QZ3Y1M making a total of £1,025.
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.