95 Godley Road, SW18 3HA
LON/00BJ/LSC/2020/0354 · service charges · Wandsworth · decided 8 Apr 2021
The tribunal found the cost of replacing the roof was reasonably incurred and payable by the leaseholder, dismissed her set-off claims for lost rent and debris removal, and ordered her to pay interest, costs and the hearing fee.
| Outcome | Payable as demanded |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not applied for |
| Section 20 consultation | Not in issue |
| Who applied | Landlord or management company |
| Freeholder / landlord | not a company, or not stated |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | none named |
| Building | A block |
| Service charge years in dispute | 2016 |
| Items in dispute | major works, other |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | £5,736.02 |
| Total found payable | £4,745.98 |
| Fees or costs ordered | the respondent to pay the applicant £555.00 costs and £200 hearing fee |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- years
The roof to the subject property was replaced in the Summer of 2016.
- outcome
1. The costs incurred by the Applicant in works of roof replacement were reasonably incurred and are payable by the Respondent.
- total demanded
Service Charges: £5736.02
- total payable
The Applicant’s claim, after adjustments for sums already paid, amounts to £4745.98.
- costs
As the Applicant has been successful, we order that the sum of £200 is to be paid to the Applicant by 7 May 2021.
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.