94 Rupert Street, Nechells, Birmingham, B7 5DS
BIR/00CN/LIS/2021/0042 · LIS · Birmingham · decided 5 Sep 2022
The tribunal found the budgeted costs for services, professional fees, utilities and insurance reasonable, and the provision for roof replacement in the reserve fund reasonable in principle, but it did not find the £7,500 reserve fund estimate reasonable because the basis for that figure was not explained.
| Outcome | Reduced |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not applied for |
| Section 20 consultation | Not in issue |
| Who applied | Landlord or management company |
| Freeholder / landlord | not a company, or not stated |
| Management company | Sycamore Management (Nechells) No.1 Ltd |
| Managing agent | none named |
| Building | A block, 13 flats |
| Service charge years in dispute | 2021 |
| Items in dispute | cleaning and grounds, insurance, legal and professional fees, management fees, repairs and maintenance, reserve fund, utilities |
| Items disallowed or reduced | reserve fund |
| Total demanded | £25,000 |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
comprises a four storey purpose built and self-contained block of 13 apartments
- freeholder
entered into by Hartley Property Trust Limited, the Applicant, and a named lessee
- management company
Sycamore Management (Nechells) No.1 Ltd (‘The Applicant’)
- years
for the period 1 October 2021 to 31 December 2021
- outcome
the Tribunal is not in a position to find that this is a reasonable estimate and so determines
- items reduced
the Tribunal is not in a position to find that this is a reasonable estimate and so determines
- total demanded
estimated service charge costs for the service charge year ending 30 September 2022, totalling £25,000.00
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.