931 Romford Road Manor Park E12 5JT
LON/00BB/LDC/2024/0082 · dispensation from consultation · Newham · decided 29 May 2024
figures not yet checkedThe tribunal refused the landlord's application for dispensation from the section 20 consultation requirements for works to replace and upgrade the water mains connections, because alternative methods and the likely cost had not been properly considered and leaseholders would be prejudiced.
| Outcome | Other decision |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not applied for |
| Section 20 consultation | Dispensation refused |
| Who applied | Landlord or management company |
| Freeholder / landlord | not a company, or not stated |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | none named |
| Building | A block, 4 flats |
| Service charge years in dispute | not stated |
| Items in dispute | other |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word; the two readings disagreed on something, so these figures haven't been checked yet and are left out of the statistics. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
the work only affects 2 flats out of 4
- s20
The tribunal refuses the application to grant dispensation from the consultation requirements of s20ZA in respect of the works required to replace and upgrade the connections from the building to the water mains.
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.