91 Greyhound Road, Fulham, London W6 8NJ
LON/00AN/LDC/2024/0010 · dispensation from consultation · Hammersmith and Fulham · decided 27 Mar 2024
The tribunal granted the landlord dispensation from the section 20 consultation requirements for urgent flat roof repairs at the property that stopped water ingress.
| Outcome | Other decision |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not applied for |
| Section 20 consultation | Dispensation granted |
| Who applied | Landlord or management company |
| Freeholder / landlord | Southern Land Securities Limited |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | Together Property Management |
| Building | A block · 2 decisions about this building |
| Service charge years in dispute | not stated |
| Items in dispute | repairs and maintenance |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | £1,188 |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
converted into three self-contained residential units
- agent
Representative : Together Property Management
- outcome
The tribunal grants the applicant landlord dispensation from all of the statutory consultation requirements of section 20 of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985
- total demanded
in the sum of £1188.00 (inclusive of VAT)
- s20
The tribunal grants the applicant landlord dispensation from all of the statutory consultation requirements of section 20 of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.