91-95 May Road, Brighton BN2 3ED
HAV/00ML/LAM/2025/0600 · appointment of a manager · Brighton and Hove · decided 28 May 2025
No plain-English summary for this decision yet. See the original.
| Outcome | Other decision |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not applied for |
| Section 20 consultation | Not in issue |
| Who applied | Leaseholder(s) |
| Freeholder / landlord | Emarketing Developments Limited |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | none named |
| Building | A block, 3 flats |
| Service charge years in dispute | not stated |
| Items in dispute | insurance, management fees, major works, repairs and maintenance, reserve fund, administration charges |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | the respondent to reimburse the application fee of £110.00 and hearing fee of £220.00 |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
The property is a three-storey building containing three self-contained flats, one on each level.
- freeholder
Respondent : Emarketing Developments Limited
- outcome
The Applicant’s application for the appointment of a manager is granted.
- costs
The Tribunal orders the Respondent to reimburse the Applicant their application fee of £110.00 and hearing fee of £220.00.
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.