9 St. Richards Court, Ashburnham Road, Richmond, Surrey, TW10 7NS
LON/00BD/LSC/2021/0378 · service charges · Richmond upon Thames · decided 17 Jun 2022
The tribunal found the service charges for 2018 to 2021 payable in full except that the 2021 estimated charge was reduced from £2,698.16 to £2,591.13, and the respondent must reimburse the landlord's application and hearing fees.
| Outcome | Reduced |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not applied for |
| Section 20 consultation | Not in issue |
| Who applied | Landlord or management company |
| Freeholder / landlord | New Hill Limited |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | Aston Rose (West End) Limited |
| Building | One flat |
| Service charge years in dispute | 2018, 2019, 2020, 2021 |
| Items in dispute | other |
| Items disallowed or reduced | other |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | the respondent to reimburse the application fee of £100.00 and the hearing fee of £200.00 |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- years
outstanding service charges for the calendar and service charge years 2018 to 2021 inclusive
- outcome
the amount payable by way of estimated service charges for 2021 is reduced from £2,698.16 to £2,591.13
- items reduced
the amount payable by way of estimated service charges for 2021 is reduced from £2,698.16 to £2,591.13
- costs
the tribunal orders the Respondent to reimburse to the Applicant the application fee of £100.00 and the hearing fee of £200.00
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.