9 St Georges Court, Nottingham, NG16 4EH
BIR/17UB/LIS/2021/0047 · LIS · Amber Valley · decided 18 Nov 2022
figures not yet checkedThe tribunal reduced some 17/18 to 19/20 service charges for insurance, repairs and legal and accountancy fees, found that the demands did not comply with section 21B and section 47 so they cannot currently be enforced, accepted an £800 per flat budget for 2020/21 and 2021/22, and made a partial 25% section 20C order.
| Outcome | Reduced |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Order made |
| Section 20 consultation | Not in issue |
| Who applied | Leaseholder(s) |
| Freeholder / landlord | The Imperial Decorating Company Ltd |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | St Georges Court (Langley Mill) Limited |
| Building | One flat, 12 flats · 2 decisions about this building |
| Service charge years in dispute | 2017, 2018 |
| Items in dispute | cleaning and grounds, insurance, legal and professional fees, other, repairs and maintenance, reserve fund, utilities |
| Items disallowed or reduced | insurance, legal and professional fees, repairs and maintenance |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word; the two readings disagreed on something, so these figures haven't been checked yet and are left out of the statistics. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
comprising of six retail units and 12 residential flats.
- freeholder
Respondent : The Imperial Decorating Company Ltd
- agent
Service charges have been demanded by a company called St Georges Court (Langley Mill) Limited
- years
24 April 2017 – 30 April 2018 (“17/18”)
- outcome
we therefore allow £2,145.80 as the insurance premium for this year instead of £2,260.00
- items reduced
The sum allowed is £437.50.
- s20c
Our order is that 25% of any legal costs arising from these proceedings
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.