9 Old Fives Court, Burnham, Slough, Berkshire SL1 7ET
CAM/11UE/LSC/2018/0062 · service charges · Buckinghamshire · decided 23 Jan 2018
The tribunal struck out the challenge to the 2017 and early 2018 service charges as already agreed, found the 2018 demands valid and the £220 managing agent fee reasonable and payable, ordered the applicant to pay the respondent's costs from 14 November 2018, and made a section 20C order in favour of current tenants.
| Outcome | Payable as demanded |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Order made |
| Section 20 consultation | Not in issue |
| Who applied | Leaseholder(s) |
| Freeholder / landlord | Wallace Partnership Reversionary Group Holdings Ltd |
| Management company | Beeches Way Management Company Ltd |
| Managing agent | Cleaver Property Management |
| Building | One flat, 24 flats |
| Service charge years in dispute | 2017, 2018 |
| Items in dispute | management fees |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | the applicant to pay the respondent's costs from 14 November 2018 |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
The applicant argued that the management charge of £220 for each of the 24 properties managed
- freeholder
Wallace Partnership Reversionary Group Holdings Ltd as the landlord
- management company
Respondent : Beeches Way Management Company Ltd
- agent
Those documents clearly identify Cleaver Property Management as the agent serving the demand
- years
service charge years 2017 and 2018
- outcome
the managing agent fee of £220 for the applicant’s property was reasonable and payable
- s20c
the Tribunal determined that it was just and equitable to make an order pursuant to s20C
- costs
the applicant shall pay the respondent’s costs from 14
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.