9 Highbury Grange, London, N5 2QB
LON/00AU/LAM/2019/0015 · appointment of a manager · Islington · decided 14 Oct 2019
figures not yet checkedThe Tribunal appointed a proposed manager from Driver and Norris Limited for three years rather than six, and made a section 20C order preventing the respondent recovering its costs through the service charge.
| Outcome | Other decision |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Order made |
| Section 20 consultation | Not in issue |
| Who applied | Leaseholder(s) |
| Freeholder / landlord | Bluehaven Estates Limited |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | none named |
| Building | A block, 7 flats · 2 decisions about this building |
| Service charge years in dispute | not stated |
| Items in dispute | major works |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word; the two readings disagreed on something, so these figures haven't been checked yet and are left out of the statistics. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
converted into 7 flats
- freeholder
Respondent : Bluehaven Estates Limited
- outcome
the Tribunal was also satisfied that Ms [name] possessed the relevant knowledge and experience to be appointed as the Manager of the property
- s20c
the Tribunal consider its just and equitable to make an order preventing it from being able to recover any such costs
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.