9 Cousins Court, 3 Alwyn Gardens, London, NW4 4XW
LON/00AC/LSC/2019/0138 · service charges · Barnet · decided 24 Jun 2019
figures not yet checkedThe tribunal found it unreasonable to charge the leaseholder for replacement windows for other flats, reducing his payable share to £504.36, dismissing the administration charges and interest, and making a s20C order.
| Outcome | Reduced |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Order made |
| Section 20 consultation | Not in issue |
| Who applied | Landlord or management company |
| Freeholder / landlord | not a company, or not stated |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | First Port Property Services |
| Building | One flat, 4 flats |
| Service charge years in dispute | 2017 |
| Items in dispute | administration charges, legal and professional fees, repairs and maintenance |
| Items disallowed or reduced | administration charges, legal and professional fees, repairs and maintenance |
| Total demanded | £2,440.47 |
| Total found payable | £504.36 |
| Fees or costs ordered | Applicant not entitled to recover court fee or solicitors' costs |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word; the two readings disagreed on something, so these figures haven't been checked yet and are left out of the statistics. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
Cousins Court is one block on an estate which consists of twelve blocks with twelve flats each
- agent
managed by First Port Property Services
- years
a contribution to reserves in September 2017
- outcome
Part of the charge is unreasonable within s27A.
- items reduced
No administration charges are recoverable
- total demanded
claiming the sum of £2,440.47 from the Respondent
- total payable
(totalling £504.36)
- s20c
an order is made under s20C LTA 1985 in favour of the Respondent
- costs
the Applicant is not entitled to recover the court fee or the solicitors’ costs either.
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.