89 Gander Green Lane, Sutton SM1 2EP
LON/00BF/LBC/2023/0024 · breach of lease · Sutton · decided 13 Mar 2024
The tribunal found the leaseholder in breach of the lease by laying hardstanding and removing part of the front boundary wall, but not in breach of the nuisance clause, and ordered her to pay the landlord's costs of £4,318.00.
| Outcome | Other decision |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not applied for |
| Section 20 consultation | Not in issue |
| Who applied | Landlord or management company |
| Freeholder / landlord | Chancery Lane Investments Limited |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | none named |
| Building | One flat, 2 flats |
| Service charge years in dispute | not stated |
| Items in dispute | legal and professional fees |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | £4,318 |
| Fees or costs ordered | respondent to pay the applicant's costs of £4,318.00 |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
detached house converted into two flats
- freeholder
Applicant : Chancery Lane Investments Limited
- outcome
The tribunal finds the respondent is in breach of clause 13 of the lease dated
- costs
the applicant’s costs in the total sum of £4,318.00 are payable by the respondent.
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.