88D Penge Road, London, SE20 7UL
LON/00AF/LSC/2022/0125 · service charges · Bromley · decided 31 Jan 2023
The applicant withdrew her challenge to the 2021-22 service charges after the respondent supplied invoices and documents, and the tribunal made no order as to costs; the tribunal declined to rule on whether roof repair charges are payable.
| Outcome | Withdrawn |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not clear |
| Section 20 consultation | Not in issue |
| Who applied | Leaseholder(s) |
| Freeholder / landlord | Naka Estates Ltd |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | Rosenewgroup Ltd |
| Building | One flat, 4 flats |
| Service charge years in dispute | 2021 |
| Items in dispute | cleaning and grounds, insurance, management fees, other |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | no order as to costs; the applicant withdrew her application for reimbursement of tribunal fees of £300 |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
one of the four flats at the subject property
- freeholder
The Respondent is the freeholder.
- agent
Rosenewgroup Ltd act as the Respondent’s agents
- years
the years 2021-22.
- outcome
The Applicant, based on information received since making her application, withdrew her challenge to the service charges.
- costs
Both parties having stated that they do not seek to recover any costs in relation to these proceedings, the Tribunal makes no order as to costs.
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.