Service Charge Check
part of Rent Rise Check: rent increases, repayment orders and licensing for renters

← Decisions near BH8 9DJ

88a Richmond Wood Road, Queens Park, Bournemouth BH8 9DJ

HAV/00HN/LBC/2024/0507 · breach of lease · Bournemouth, Christchurch and Poole · decided 27 May 2025

The landlords sought determinations of breach of lease and the tribunal found the tenant in breach for non-payment of demanded sums, letting a room in breach of the single-household user covenant, and refusing access, while the alleged alterations, camera, nuisance and harassment breaches were not made out.

OutcomeOther decision
Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case)Not applied for
Section 20 consultationNot in issue
Who appliedLandlord or management company
Freeholder / landlordnot a company, or not stated
Management companynone named
Managing agentnone named
BuildingOne flat, 2 flats
Service charge years in dispute2024, 2025
Items in disputecleaning and grounds, insurance, repairs and maintenance
Items disallowed or reducedinsurance, repairs and maintenance
Total demandednot stated as one figure
Total found payablenot stated as one figure
Fees or costs orderednone stated

Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.

What the decision says

flats n
converted around 1976 into two flats
years
£206.64 for building insurance for the year 23/24
outcome
we determine that the following breaches of lease have occurred
items reduced
We do not consider those sums are payable as the insurance was not in joint names.

The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].

The original

If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).

Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.

Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.