88 Onslow Gardens London SW7 3BS
LON/00AW/LDC/2021/0075 · dispensation from consultation · Kensington and Chelsea · decided 8 Jun 2021
The tribunal granted the landlord dispensation from the section 20 consultation requirements for urgent works to repair water ingress causing damage to one flat, estimated at £2,292 including VAT.
| Outcome | Other decision |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not applied for |
| Section 20 consultation | Dispensation granted |
| Who applied | Landlord or management company |
| Freeholder / landlord | The Wellcome Trust Ltd |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | Savills (UK) Ltd |
| Building | One flat, 6 flats |
| Service charge years in dispute | not stated |
| Items in dispute | repairs and maintenance |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
one of the 6 flats in the building
- freeholder
Applicant : The Wellcome Trust Ltd
- agent
Representative : [name] (UK) Ltd
- outcome
The Tribunal determines that it will exercise its discretion to dispense with the consultation requirements imposed by s.20 of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985
- s20
The Tribunal determines that it will exercise its discretion to dispense with the consultation requirements imposed by s.20 of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.